PDA

View Full Version : Retail Edition of the R600 Pictured!


Anusha
03-22-2007, 06:50 AM
VR-Zone has a few, interesting shots!
We saw some R600 cards at CeBIT but any form of photography is restricted as AMD is keeping a close watch making sure nothing is leaked outside. Nevertheless, we still managed to get some shots on the retail R600XTX (Radeon X2900 XTX) card. The frontal shot contains sensitive information so we can't show it here.

Just a recap of what we have told you before, R600XTX retail card is codenamed Dragonhead 2. It is a 12-layer card at 9.5" long with a max TDP of 240W. It is clocked at 800MHz on 80nm process technology, 512-bit memory interface and has 1GB GDDR4 memories onboard. It has 6-pin and 8-pin PCIe connectors but two 2x3 PCIe power can be used. Rumors surfaced over at CeBIT that the final product may be on 65nm if it can be produced in time with reasonable good yield. So far we have yet to get a confirmation that the first shipping R600 cards will be on 65nm but we can't rule out that there are experimental R600 chips at 65nm now. If our source is right, the yield at 65nm is poor at this point of time and expect a limited quantity of 20,000 pieces of R600XTX by middle of April.
Source: VR-Zone (http://www.vr-zone.com/?i=4830) (you'll find the pics here)

shanX
03-22-2007, 10:49 PM
So whr's pics???

tckrockz
03-22-2007, 10:54 PM
ko pics

Anusha
03-22-2007, 10:59 PM
Go to that link :S

shanX
03-23-2007, 09:48 PM
Go to that link :S
Well, I thought you'd post stuff related to the thread :rolleyes: :D

blood_brotha
03-23-2007, 10:03 PM
and it would be creamed by nvidia

Anusha
03-23-2007, 10:08 PM
Well, I thought you'd post stuff related to the thread :rolleyes: :D
I didn't say pictures. I said pictured. Go see an eye specialist or follow an English course (whatever is more suitable). :rolleyes:

Anusha
03-23-2007, 10:10 PM
and it would be creamed by nvidia
Wonder how :S

shanX
03-23-2007, 10:31 PM
I didn't say pictures. I said pictured. Go see an eye specialist or follow an English course (whatever is more suitable). :rolleyes:
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: I though you hav pictured it :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

K. sir, I'll do as u say :lol: :lol: :lol: