PDA

View Full Version : Whats better OCed? 45nm 1333 or 65nm 1066


zCexVe
11-20-2007, 10:58 PM
This goes to Intel Overclockerz........
As I was thinking of OCing with the latest 45nm CPUs I got to that it'll do OC better with lower TDP,much space things.But since its 333 base rather than 266 base (67 more) we get less FSB to OC right?.Coz whether its 1333 or 1066 our mobos have the same max FSBs.
And then again Its their performance as shown below is different.So when the things OCed to same, the performance will be more in 45nm.The below images are from XS.
http://img138.imageshack.us/img138/3344/attachmentjs8.jpg
http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/3474/16132825092007core20frezg5.jpg

http://img81.imageshack.us/img81/8564/45uo6vk3.jpg


whatcha gonna do? 45 or 65nm.Remember that a Q6600 is 270$ retail.

geethq
11-20-2007, 11:03 PM
thank for this wery very important informations machan

shahrukh1986
11-20-2007, 11:04 PM
Who Cares..???

geethq
11-20-2007, 11:12 PM
Who Cares..???
ppl not care=idiots like u:P

zCexVe
11-20-2007, 11:13 PM
Who Cares..???
oya shahrukh patiyek vage.:P Eka thama meva gena care karanne neththe.
We care dude.

zCexVe
11-20-2007, 11:14 PM
thank for this wery very important informations machan
whats your op on this?

geethq
11-20-2007, 11:54 PM
whats your op on this?
penryn tiya C2 ekak athagaapu dawasaka dennam:lol: :lol: :lol: