rapa
11-02-2006, 10:45 AM
Should there be peace talks with the LTTE Tamil terrorists?
1. No country in the world conducts peace talks with terrorists.
2. Instead, the major western countries have been, and still are, engaged in all-out wars to TOTALLY
ERADICATE terrorism in Afghanistan and Iraq, and have been also relentlessly pursuing terrorists in the
USA, UK and other western countries.
3. The rule of law states that there must be only ONE law in a country and that it must apply EQUALLY to
everyone. Therefore, under the law, ALL terrorists and other criminals MUST be prosecuted and punished.
4. Since the Sri Lankan government refused to have peace talks with Sinhela terrorists in the past, to have peace
talks with Tamil terrorists is, therefore, racially discriminatory and unlawful.
5. Moreover, if the government conducts peace talks with mass murderers, what right will it have to imprison, or
even impose fines on, petty criminals? It would, therefore, also be forced to have peace talks with lesser
criminals like single murderers, thieves and pickpockets. The government will also, then, be forced to conduct
peace talks with all other - Sinhela, Tamil etc. - terrorist groups as well in the future.
6. How, then, will the government be able to maintain law and order if it is forced to negotiate with criminals?
7. To negotiate with terrorists and other criminals violates a number of sections of the Constitution of the
Republic of Sri Lanka, including those relating to Fundamental Rights. Since the Tamil terrorists have been
waging war against the Republic for the past 23 years, they are chargeable with High Treason.
8. Since the demands of the Tamil terrorists relates to control over parts of the territory of Sri Lanka, any
negotiation with the terrorists also violates various sections of the Constitution of the Democratic Socialist
Republic of Sri Lanka, relating to the sovereignty and integrity of the country. To conduct negotiations with
terrorists on such matters would also be treasonous.
9. If the Tamil terrorists have been able to cause damage to the government forces, it is due partly to the
government’s bad strategy and partly due to the strength the terrorists acquired during previous six ceasefires:
each time the Tamil terrorists have used the opportunity to re-arm and consolidate themselves.
10. Above all, since the objective of the terrorists in demanding a ceasefire is for the purpose of obtaining
recognition and territory, they will then be able to strengthen their forces by legally obtaining foreign loans
and buying more weapons from other countries. If, then, they attack yet again, more government soldiers and
civilians will be killed in the efforts to restore law and order.
11. If the government says that it cannot defeat the terrorists now, how will it be able to resist them if they
legally obtain foreign loans and buy more and better weapons? They might take-over the whole country!
12. According to World Facts, the percentage of Tamils (Other than ‘Indian Tamils’) in Sri Lanka now is just
4.9%, because of the emigration of more than one million Tamils to the West as bogus ‘refugees’. Therefore,
to create a federal state, carved out of the Sinhela motherland, as a virtual separate racist, segregated and
apartheid Tamil state for this tiny community of Tamils is also a violation of the Democratic Rights and
Human Rights of the indigenous 82% Sinhelas.
13. Instead, it is the duty of the government to inform the world community that:
(a) (As shown on the reverse of this leaflet), the Tamil Country (Tamil motherland) with its population of 57
million Tamils is Tamil Nadu – which is twice the size of Sri Lanka.
(b) No nation in the world is entitled to more than one Country (motherland);
(c) Sri Lanka, this tiny Island, is, correspondingly, the Sinhela Country (Sinhela motherland);
14. Sri Lanka is a small Island (279 miles long and 136 miles at its widest) and the Tamil terrorists are located in
a tiny part of it. Moreover, the terrorists number less than 3,000, while the Sri Lankan army, itself, is 150,000
strong! It would not be difficult for the security forces to even encircle and blockade the terrorist locations
and even simply starve them out of food and provisions – like in a mediaeval siege.
Should there be any further devolution of powers to the north and east?
1. Under the Constitution, discrimination is prohibited and every citizen is entitled to be treated equally.
This includes the rights to travel to, live, establish businesses etc. in ANY part of the Island.
2. Accordingly, it is unlawful and illegal to permit the creation of racist, segregated or apartheid ghetto areas for
Tamils, Muslims etc. or to hand over parts of the Island to anyone or any community.
3. The Government is, therefore, obliged by the Constitution to restore to the north and the east the Sinhelas and
Muslims who were driven away by the Tamil terrorists in their ethnic-cleansing programme, and to encourage
Sinhelas and other citizens to settle down there.
4. The Tesavalamai law which prevents Sinhelas from buying land in the north or east (in their own motherland!),
and all other similarly racially-discriminatory and illegal laws violate the Constitution, are, therefore, ultra vires.
5. Therefore, the control of any part of the Sinhela motherland by (the non-indigenous) Tamils – whether by
creating a federal state or by partitioning – is tantamount to an invasion of the Sinhela Country
(Motherland); and the government is legally obliged by the Constitution to defend the Territory by taking
action against such invaders.
6. Such a federal state or partitioning is also racially discriminatory, a violation of the Fundamental Rights
and Human Rights of the indigenous Sinhela Nation and a violation of its right of self-determination.
7. Under the Constitution, Sovereignty is owned by the People and the mandate given by the People to a
Government at the Election is to GOVERN – which includes maintaining law and order and upholding
the Constitution. It is unlawful to form a National Government (by forming coalitions of parties) for the
purpose of violating that mandate.
8. If a government is unable to comply with the People’s mandate under which it was given power, it is obliged by
the Constitution to hold fresh elections to enable the People to express their will.
1. No country in the world conducts peace talks with terrorists.
2. Instead, the major western countries have been, and still are, engaged in all-out wars to TOTALLY
ERADICATE terrorism in Afghanistan and Iraq, and have been also relentlessly pursuing terrorists in the
USA, UK and other western countries.
3. The rule of law states that there must be only ONE law in a country and that it must apply EQUALLY to
everyone. Therefore, under the law, ALL terrorists and other criminals MUST be prosecuted and punished.
4. Since the Sri Lankan government refused to have peace talks with Sinhela terrorists in the past, to have peace
talks with Tamil terrorists is, therefore, racially discriminatory and unlawful.
5. Moreover, if the government conducts peace talks with mass murderers, what right will it have to imprison, or
even impose fines on, petty criminals? It would, therefore, also be forced to have peace talks with lesser
criminals like single murderers, thieves and pickpockets. The government will also, then, be forced to conduct
peace talks with all other - Sinhela, Tamil etc. - terrorist groups as well in the future.
6. How, then, will the government be able to maintain law and order if it is forced to negotiate with criminals?
7. To negotiate with terrorists and other criminals violates a number of sections of the Constitution of the
Republic of Sri Lanka, including those relating to Fundamental Rights. Since the Tamil terrorists have been
waging war against the Republic for the past 23 years, they are chargeable with High Treason.
8. Since the demands of the Tamil terrorists relates to control over parts of the territory of Sri Lanka, any
negotiation with the terrorists also violates various sections of the Constitution of the Democratic Socialist
Republic of Sri Lanka, relating to the sovereignty and integrity of the country. To conduct negotiations with
terrorists on such matters would also be treasonous.
9. If the Tamil terrorists have been able to cause damage to the government forces, it is due partly to the
government’s bad strategy and partly due to the strength the terrorists acquired during previous six ceasefires:
each time the Tamil terrorists have used the opportunity to re-arm and consolidate themselves.
10. Above all, since the objective of the terrorists in demanding a ceasefire is for the purpose of obtaining
recognition and territory, they will then be able to strengthen their forces by legally obtaining foreign loans
and buying more weapons from other countries. If, then, they attack yet again, more government soldiers and
civilians will be killed in the efforts to restore law and order.
11. If the government says that it cannot defeat the terrorists now, how will it be able to resist them if they
legally obtain foreign loans and buy more and better weapons? They might take-over the whole country!
12. According to World Facts, the percentage of Tamils (Other than ‘Indian Tamils’) in Sri Lanka now is just
4.9%, because of the emigration of more than one million Tamils to the West as bogus ‘refugees’. Therefore,
to create a federal state, carved out of the Sinhela motherland, as a virtual separate racist, segregated and
apartheid Tamil state for this tiny community of Tamils is also a violation of the Democratic Rights and
Human Rights of the indigenous 82% Sinhelas.
13. Instead, it is the duty of the government to inform the world community that:
(a) (As shown on the reverse of this leaflet), the Tamil Country (Tamil motherland) with its population of 57
million Tamils is Tamil Nadu – which is twice the size of Sri Lanka.
(b) No nation in the world is entitled to more than one Country (motherland);
(c) Sri Lanka, this tiny Island, is, correspondingly, the Sinhela Country (Sinhela motherland);
14. Sri Lanka is a small Island (279 miles long and 136 miles at its widest) and the Tamil terrorists are located in
a tiny part of it. Moreover, the terrorists number less than 3,000, while the Sri Lankan army, itself, is 150,000
strong! It would not be difficult for the security forces to even encircle and blockade the terrorist locations
and even simply starve them out of food and provisions – like in a mediaeval siege.
Should there be any further devolution of powers to the north and east?
1. Under the Constitution, discrimination is prohibited and every citizen is entitled to be treated equally.
This includes the rights to travel to, live, establish businesses etc. in ANY part of the Island.
2. Accordingly, it is unlawful and illegal to permit the creation of racist, segregated or apartheid ghetto areas for
Tamils, Muslims etc. or to hand over parts of the Island to anyone or any community.
3. The Government is, therefore, obliged by the Constitution to restore to the north and the east the Sinhelas and
Muslims who were driven away by the Tamil terrorists in their ethnic-cleansing programme, and to encourage
Sinhelas and other citizens to settle down there.
4. The Tesavalamai law which prevents Sinhelas from buying land in the north or east (in their own motherland!),
and all other similarly racially-discriminatory and illegal laws violate the Constitution, are, therefore, ultra vires.
5. Therefore, the control of any part of the Sinhela motherland by (the non-indigenous) Tamils – whether by
creating a federal state or by partitioning – is tantamount to an invasion of the Sinhela Country
(Motherland); and the government is legally obliged by the Constitution to defend the Territory by taking
action against such invaders.
6. Such a federal state or partitioning is also racially discriminatory, a violation of the Fundamental Rights
and Human Rights of the indigenous Sinhela Nation and a violation of its right of self-determination.
7. Under the Constitution, Sovereignty is owned by the People and the mandate given by the People to a
Government at the Election is to GOVERN – which includes maintaining law and order and upholding
the Constitution. It is unlawful to form a National Government (by forming coalitions of parties) for the
purpose of violating that mandate.
8. If a government is unable to comply with the People’s mandate under which it was given power, it is obliged by
the Constitution to hold fresh elections to enable the People to express their will.