PDA

View Full Version : Crysis system requirements released


Anusha
11-07-2006, 10:25 PM
The 2nd game from Crytek after Farcry is the game everyone is looking forward to. The developers have released the system requirements for the game and it looks like that these will be final. Here's the requirements:

Minimum Requirements
CPU: Athlon 64 3000+/Intel 2.8ghz
Graphics: Nvidia 6200 or ATI X1300 - Shader Model 2.0
RAM: 768MB on Windows XP or 1GB on Windows Vista
HDD: 6GB
Internet: 256k+
Optical Drive: DVD
Software: DX9.0c with Windows XP

Recommended Requirements
CPU: Dual-core CPU (Athlon X2/Pentium D)
Graphics: Nvidia 7600GT or ATI X1800GTO (SM 3.0) or DX10 equivalent
RAM: 1.5GB+
HDD: 6GB
Internet: 512k+ (128k+ upstream)
Optical Drive: DVD
Software: DX9.0c with Windows XP

Source: www.crysis-online.com (http://www.crysis-online.com/Information/System%20Requirements/)

Seems like my new video card is supported. Yippie...:love:

Novindu
11-07-2006, 10:30 PM
damn........ what a confin man:lol::lol:

Anusha
11-07-2006, 10:33 PM
LOL.
However, considering what people used to tell, I'm relieved that it's this good. I first heard that you would at least need a Geforce 7 series card just to run it - not play it (if you get what i mean ;))

Novindu
11-07-2006, 10:37 PM
yeah i get it:lol::lol: so dat means ur relieved ha??? so ive nwa played dis game but like ta try it bfr da end of 2007:lol::lol::lol::lol:

themera
11-08-2006, 04:54 AM
omg man i cannot play that on my pc

Anusha
11-08-2006, 06:05 AM
Too bad hey

sridanu
11-08-2006, 06:40 AM
well i guess i have to wait a loooooooooooooooooooong time b4 i can play a game like that:)

themera
11-08-2006, 07:34 AM
well i guess i have to wait a loooooooooooooooooooong time b4 i can play a game like that:)
yeah mucho but grapfix would be owsoem neda

HishamZz
11-08-2006, 07:52 AM
woofah.. oh wel.. @least ma colour card is just AT the minimum requirements.. lmao.. freakin RAM needs a upgo though.. shit..

Zz

Novindu
11-08-2006, 08:20 AM
Too bad hey
yeah:(:(:(

Novindu
11-08-2006, 08:21 AM
well i guess i have to wait a loooooooooooooooooooong time b4 i can play a game like that:)
same prob with me dude:(:(

Novindu
11-08-2006, 08:22 AM
yeah mucho but grapfix would be owsoem neda
hey man dun tempt us to da game:lol::lol::lol:

Novindu
11-08-2006, 08:22 AM
woofah.. oh wel.. @least ma colour card is just AT the minimum requirements.. lmao.. freakin RAM needs a upgo though.. shit..

Zz
haha aa so even u cant play dis beauity ha???????:D:D:D:D

sridanu
11-08-2006, 08:26 AM
yeah mucho but grapfix would be owsoem neda

not in my PC it wont. :lol:

thilinapm
11-08-2006, 08:40 AM
The 2nd game from Crytek after Farcry is the game everyone is looking forward to. The developers have released the system requirements for the game and it looks like that these will be final. Here's the requirements:

Minimum Requirements
CPU: Athlon 64 3000+/Intel 2.8ghz
Graphics: Nvidia 6200 or ATI X1300 - Shader Model 2.0
RAM: 768MB on Windows XP or 1GB on Windows Vista
HDD: 6GB
Internet: 256k+
Optical Drive: DVD
Software: DX9.0c with Windows XP

Recommended Requirements
CPU: Dual-core CPU (Athlon X2/Pentium D)
Graphics: Nvidia 7600GT or ATI X1800GTO (SM 3.0) or DX10 equivalent
RAM: 1.5GB+
HDD: 6GB
Internet: 512k+ (128k+ upstream)
Optical Drive: DVD
Software: DX9.0c with Windows XP

Source: www.crysis-online.com (http://www.crysis-online.com/Information/System%20Requirements/)

Seems like my new video card is supported. Yippie...:love:


wht a f***...

HishamZz
11-08-2006, 09:16 AM
@ Novidhu - at da rate dese bastardz are creatin hi-req gamez no gamer could live in peace wit a single pc dude.. lol.. datz da scrwed part..

Zz

Novindu
11-08-2006, 09:28 AM
@ Novidhu - at da rate dese bastardz are creatin hi-req gamez no gamer could live in peace wit a single pc dude.. lol.. datz da scrwed part..

Zz
hell yeah.... damn dey rapidly change da req's........dats shit....... how can we ppl afford??????????:(:(

HishamZz
11-08-2006, 10:03 AM
one way to beat da time factor is to buy the highest performance components available in the market.. and be satisfied as it would be guaranteed to last prob a year or 2 depending on the technology... but hel.. datz need money too hehee..

Zz

Anusha
11-08-2006, 10:24 AM
woofah.. oh wel.. @least ma colour card is just AT the minimum requirements.. lmao.. freakin RAM needs a upgo though.. shit..

Zz

Well, if you go for Vista, then take NO notice of Microsoft's claims. You need 2GB RAM to run Vista fine.

You know. Vista will even benefit going from 2GB to 4GB RAM. In XP, people might not even see a difference unless they game, going from 1GB to 1.5GB. The way Vista treats RAM is completely different. It will use RAM as a cache. If you have 1GB RAM, you will have 0MB free physical RAM. Same if you have 2GB. No change for 4GB as well. At least, it's using the RAM without wasting it by not using them.

Anusha
11-08-2006, 10:37 AM
one way to beat da time factor is to buy the highest performance components available in the market.. and be satisfied as it would be guaranteed to last prob a year or 2 depending on the technology... but hel.. datz need money too hehee..

Zz

I don't think that's a good thing. Think about this...

Geforce 7950GX2, which is the fastest single card, is available for Rs.75,000 at EPSI. My new card only cost me Rs.9,500 which is only about 4 times slower. Now, that 75,000 card will be superseded by even a Geforce 8600GT or at least come close to the performance. It should not cost more than US$200 (but no idea how much it will be in Sri Lanka). Say it will be Rs.35,000. If you buy that card in another year, you have got the same performance as the 75,000 card but only 1 year late.

My new card (X800GTO flashed to X800XL and overclocked further) can play almost every game at max details at 1280x960. Say I'm getting 30fps in a game. 7950GX2 can't give more than 100. Ok, say it's giving 100fps. If you disregard the framerates, with both cards, you can play the game at max details without lagging. So why pay Rs.65,500 more for 70fps which is not noticeable for real world game play?

Best thing is to get a video card which is in the mid-range, and upgrade it constantly (say, every 12, 15 or 18 months). You still can play almost all your games with lots of details, and you are spending less. Remember, also inflation will result in lower money spending in another year's time. 35000 today will have higher value than 35000 next year.

So in the end, you are only spending half the price, and still getting a marvellous gaming experience.

Oh I forgot. Remember, 7950GX2 is only DirectX9 card. 8600GT is a DirectX10 card. In Crysis, DX10 card will shine a lot more than the DX9 card. (Crysis is natively DX10).

HishamZz
11-08-2006, 10:50 AM
as i said earlier.. personal preference varies from people to people.. i prefer have the simplicity of having a single high-end comp for now which would relatively play al da newer and upcoming games not to the max performance but at a satisfactory level without the constant need for upgrades...

i aint da high-budgeted people too.. so me upgradin would definitely torment me.. i do agree though about your thoughts relating to price.. i have gone thru it myself and have seen da costliest of components suddenly becoming brinjals for purchase lol.. but the constant need for upgrade with time is not somethin i could do wit.. its a personal preference o mine and economical wise.. when it comes to me .. it would benefit as i would not be doin any further upgrades for bout lets 2 to 3 years.. thus saving me the money i would effectively spend on upgrading a mid-end pc from time to time and not to mention.. the hassle...

wel thats ma thought.. its open to various interpretations nevertheless ;-)

shit... bloody RAM prices outta be down but dese moronz are profiteering outta it.. seagull mageh salli kyaawath ekaka.. DAMN!!!

Zz

Anusha
11-08-2006, 01:10 PM
Agreed with RAM prices, but it's not only in Sri Lanka. RAM prices have gone up in the whole world. Considering those prices, some stores in Sri Lanka have better prices than some of USA.