BEAUTY N LOVE... -
01-15-2007, 10:56 PM
...BEAUTY N LOVE...
Well, if the approach is only to know the connotation of these two words, then that would be no more than natural world, these are only the descents, but as I thinks, this only won't suit your mutual thoughts of philosophy. If a philosophical answer is what you are tentatively proposed to, (as I thinks because every person has got its own thinking, some people might be thinking about it just as the synonyms), so the description would of "love" be: It is permanent, and exists between only two permanent objects or living things.
The sensation that exists between two humans isn't love. It can't be love and substantiate that one does not need any extra rationalistic thoughts. So here it draw closer. Love originally means permanent, and a characteristic and a feeling, which can subsist flanked by only two permanents. Two humans aren't permanents and can't be permanent towards each other. For a bit illustration: your soul can't love your body and neither you’re prolongation, why? Because a day will when your soul will leave its existence, and of coarse your corpse. So there can't be any love. There isn't any love between any mom and a child, why? Because one day will come when your mom or you will leave your mom ahead. So no love in that even.
Listen I am not trying to say that there isn't any relation, the thing is only that we humans request, we be concerned, or a rapport of "cohort" can even transmit the name. But if still you'll use to word "love", then it would be nothing but irrational, and a bit more effective to your grammar skills.
"Love” exists between only two i.e. the creator and the creation"
Beauty: it is the art of one's imaginations and can be of world too, in which you considers everything to be beautiful in its own way, if slight in a negative sense then dark beauty or black beauty, but it always sticks with beauty only.
What is beauty and Love through you people?