Ford GT (lots of pics not 56k friendly)

sld

Member
Aug 30, 2006
8,479
2
0
LA, California
IMG_9915Medium.jpg

IMG_9912Medium.jpg

IMG_9910Medium.jpg

IMG_9907Medium.jpg

IMG_9906Medium.jpg

IMG_9904Medium.jpg

IMG_9903Medium.jpg

IMG_9902Medium.jpg

IMG_9901Medium.jpg

IMG_9899Medium.jpg

IMG_9897Medium.jpg

IMG_9896Medium.jpg

IMG_9895Medium.jpg

IMG_9894Medium.jpg

IMG_9893Medium.jpg

IMG_9892Medium.jpg

IMG_9889Medium.jpg

IMG_9887Medium.jpg


IMG_9885Medium.jpg

IMG_9884Medium.jpg

IMG_9883Medium.jpg

IMG_9882Medium.jpg
 

sld

Member
Aug 30, 2006
8,479
2
0
LA, California
The GT is equipped with a standard 5.4-liter, V8, 550-horsepower, supercharged engine that achieves 13-mpg in the city and 21-mpg on the highway. A 6-speed manual transmission with overdrive is standard. $150000.

0-603.60 sec.

1/4 Mile11.70 sec.

60-0 Braking122.00 ft.

80-0 Braking214.00 ft.

IssueDec-05

Skidpad1.00 g.

Slalom69.60 mph

Top Speed205.00 mph
 

Anusha

Member
Jun 13, 2006
25,864
5
0
DJ.Parker said:
rear wheels r better than front wheels?:confused:

These are not meant to climb mountains or designed for rough roads. So front wheel is not necessary. I think front wheel is more expensive and difficult to build. Not sure though.

And with the rear half weighing more, there won't be any tire slipping.
 

DJ.Parker

Member
Jul 22, 2006
10,827
5
0
Anusha said:
These are not meant to climb mountains or designed for rough roads. So front wheel is not necessary. I think front wheel is more expensive and difficult to build. Not sure though.

And with the rear half weighing more, there won't be any tire slipping.


rear wheels go faster than front wheels?